Post by account_disabled on Mar 10, 2024 4:05:47 GMT
Welcome to a new episode of Colloquia Podcast! The Foundation podcast Fide dedicated to expanding the debate on the most relevant legal-economic issues. In this new episode we have the privilege of having with us Francisco de la Torre, whose work, «And this, who pays for it?«, immerses us in a fascinating journey through the complexities of the economy and its impact on our daily lives. In recent years, we have witnessed monumental changes in the world landscape. From the devastation caused by the financial crisis to the unprecedented impact of the global pandemic, our societies have faced unimaginable challenges. As we fight for understand the origin and causes of these economic crises, we are faced with crucial questions: How can we avoid the negative economic consequences? What is the role of technological progress in our recovery? Are taxes part of the problem or part of the solution? And the most important question of all: Who pays the price for these challenges? In today's episode we will try to answer some of these questions, being faithful to the clear and accessible style that Paco offers in his book.
Questions How does inflation affect taxes, spending and public debt? Does our tax system need an in-depth reform? In caso yes, what would be the lines of this? recap on the topic, stating that in the European Union (“EU”), the relationship between design and copyright law has always been a hot topic. Today such discussion is more relevant than ever, as a consequence of the ongoing reform of the EU legislation on design protection, the so-called Design Package. It was also emphasized that in the last ten years the European Court of Justice (ECJ), in some landmark cases (eg, 12 September 2019 [C-683/17], “cofemel” and 11 June 2020 [C-833/18], “Brompton"), confirmed the possibility of dual protection for USA Phone Number designs of applied art, both under copyright and design law. Thus, at least within the EU framework, designs of functional objects such as lamps can nowadays be protected by both regimes. This gives rise to some legal uncertainty, due to the different protection periods and to the fact that the expiration of design rights on an object will not automatically guarantee that that design can be used, since copyright may exist on top of that object.
In other jurisdictions, the situation is radically different.matter protected under design law can at the same time be protected as a copyrightable work, as long as it satisfies the intellectual creation test (ie, it is the author's own intellectual creation), the so-called originality requirement. Before the Cofemel decision, it was not clear if the Member States of the EU could independently establish the preconditions Taxes on banks, energy companies and large fortunes. An assessment. Is there any solution for multinationals to pay the taxes that should correspond to them in each territory in which they operate? Should more be collected for Corporation Tax? In that casoHow could collection be increased without hindering investment and growth? Is the increase in public spending inevitable or can it be reduced? Podcast S2E04 – And this, who pays for it?: Economy for adults 19.43 mins With Francisco de la Torre Diaz, Tax inspector. Former deputy and president of the Congressional Budget Committee.
Questions How does inflation affect taxes, spending and public debt? Does our tax system need an in-depth reform? In caso yes, what would be the lines of this? recap on the topic, stating that in the European Union (“EU”), the relationship between design and copyright law has always been a hot topic. Today such discussion is more relevant than ever, as a consequence of the ongoing reform of the EU legislation on design protection, the so-called Design Package. It was also emphasized that in the last ten years the European Court of Justice (ECJ), in some landmark cases (eg, 12 September 2019 [C-683/17], “cofemel” and 11 June 2020 [C-833/18], “Brompton"), confirmed the possibility of dual protection for USA Phone Number designs of applied art, both under copyright and design law. Thus, at least within the EU framework, designs of functional objects such as lamps can nowadays be protected by both regimes. This gives rise to some legal uncertainty, due to the different protection periods and to the fact that the expiration of design rights on an object will not automatically guarantee that that design can be used, since copyright may exist on top of that object.
In other jurisdictions, the situation is radically different.matter protected under design law can at the same time be protected as a copyrightable work, as long as it satisfies the intellectual creation test (ie, it is the author's own intellectual creation), the so-called originality requirement. Before the Cofemel decision, it was not clear if the Member States of the EU could independently establish the preconditions Taxes on banks, energy companies and large fortunes. An assessment. Is there any solution for multinationals to pay the taxes that should correspond to them in each territory in which they operate? Should more be collected for Corporation Tax? In that casoHow could collection be increased without hindering investment and growth? Is the increase in public spending inevitable or can it be reduced? Podcast S2E04 – And this, who pays for it?: Economy for adults 19.43 mins With Francisco de la Torre Diaz, Tax inspector. Former deputy and president of the Congressional Budget Committee.
